BanklessTimes
Home Articles US Senators Move to Shield Blockchain Developers from Money Rules

US Senators Move to Shield Blockchain Developers from Money Rules

Simon Simba
Simon Simba
Simon is a writer with five years experience in crypto and iGaming. He currently works as a freelance writer at BanklessTimes where he focuses on simplifying daily crypto developments for readers. He discovered crypto in 2022 while writing news about NFTs for a news website in the US, and has since written for two other international NFT projects, and a Web3 gaming agency.
Updated: January 13th, 2026

U.S. Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden have introduced a bipartisan bill. The bill aims to clearly separate non‑custodial blockchain developers from regulated money transmitters under federal law. The proposal, called the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), arrived just as the Senate prepares to debate a broader crypto market structure package this month.

At its core, the bill states that software developers, miners, node operators and infrastructure providers who do not control users’ funds or hold private keys should not be treated as money transmitters. Lawmakers frame the measure as a way to protect open‑source development and avoid treating people who write or maintain code like banks or payment processors.

What the Bill by US Senators Would Change

The BRCA would create a federal definition of a “non‑controlling developer or provider.” This would cover people and businesses that build or maintain distributed ledger technology but lack the unilateral ability to move customer assets. Activities such as publishing code, maintaining blockchain infrastructure, offering self‑custody tools or running validator nodes would not, by themselves, trigger money transmitter registration duties.

The bill attempts to harmonize federal and state approaches. This is by preventing states from imposing money transmitter rules on developers engaged only in these protected activities. Additionally, while preserving state authority where firms actually hold or move client funds.

Supporters argue this needs clarity to stop pushing development offshore. Furthermore, clarity would align law with existing Treasury guidance that focuses on entities that truly control customer assets.

Reaction from Industry and Lawmakers

Lummis, said it “makes no sense” to classify developers as money transmitters. This is because they never touch user funds and that such treatment “unnecessarily limits innovation.” Wyden has stressed civil‑liberties concerns, warning that forcing coders to follow the same rules as exchanges risks undermining privacy and free speech rights.

The Blockchain Association and the DeFi Education Fund are among the crypto advocacy groups that have approved the BRCA as a crucial protection for decentralized and non-custodial initiatives. They want this wording to remain in the broader market structure measure. This is because it is where future Senate Banking and Agriculture Committee markups are also negotiating similar provisions.

READ MORE: Ethereum Price Forms a Mega Bullish Pattern as Key Metric Points to Undervaluation

Follow Bankless Times on Google News

We`ve got crypto covered – every trend, every insight, every move that matters. Add us to your feed and stay ahead of the market.

Contributors

Simon Simba
Simon is a writer with five years experience in crypto and iGaming. He currently works as a freelance writer at BanklessTimes where he focuses on simplifying daily crypto developments for readers. He discovered crypto in 2022 while writing news about NFTs for a news website in the US, and has since written for two other international NFT projects, and a Web3 gaming agency.